Text size adjustment
Hold down the Ctrl key (PC) or Cmd key (MAC) and press "+" to enlarge or "-" to reduce the text size.
Reporting shall be in accordance with the NPD's resource classification 2016.
Below is a short description of terms used;
RC 0 includes petroleum quantities that have been produced (sold and delivered).
Reserves comprise the remaining recoverable, marketable petroleum resources in RC 1-3.
The term RC 0+1 has been established to show the estimated original recoverable quantities from a project based on the current understanding of the size of the quantities not yet produced. Sold and delivered quantities are also included. Petroleum quantities in projects in production should be reported in RC 0+1.
RC 4, 5, 6 and 7 represent recoverable petroleum quantities in projects where a development decision has not yet been made.
RC 8 comprises undiscovered petroleum quantities in mapped prospects. The total risk-weighted recoverable resources in prospects that lie partly or completely within the field's/the discovery's licensed area shall be reported.
Expected resource class as of 31.12 of the current year shall be used as a basis. If a decision is expected by the end of the current year (31.12), the project shall be reported in the resource class that results from this decision. An example of this is if a Plan for Development and Operation (PDO) is expected to be submitted to the authorities before the end of the year, the project shall be reported in RC 3.
Note that for recovery projects, both volumes in-place and recoverable volumes shall be reported. Low, base and high estimates shall be reported for the petroleum volumes. For projects with project category A, ref resource classification, no in-place volumes shall be reported.
Projects connected to pipelines and terminals are classified according to decision status (planned, decided, approved), similar to classification of recoverable volumes.
The main tables from NPD’s resource classification 2016 are shown below.
Table 3‑1 Overview of classes, resource classes (sub-classes), project categories and uncertainty categories
Table 3-2 Classes and sub-classes
Table 3-3 Project categories1
Table 3-4 Uncertainty categories
Projects with additional volumes in fields must be classified either as reserves or as contingent resources.
The following criteria shall be applied to classify projects as reserves:
Quantities from all projects with wells mentioned above shall be reported as reserves in resource class 0+1, 2 or 3. If the operator wishes, quantities from well projects classified as reserves can be reported in separate consistent profiles, as follows;
w RC 0+1: Quantities from projects with wells in production
w RC 2: Quantities from projects with wells with approved budget
w RC 3: Remaining quantities from projects with wells that can be reported as reserves
Well projects planned to be drilled but which do not meet the criteria above, will be linked to the quantities of petroleum which are classified as contingent resources in resource class 4, 5, 6 or 7.
w Recovery methods under evaluation or significant expansion of existing recovery methods that will yield extra volumes and a higher recovery factor if implemented (project category A), or
w Segments/ parts of the reservoir not currently PDO-approved, and which will yield increased STOOIP/GIIP (project category F), or
w Changes to new form of operation, new or modified facility that will yield higher/accelerated production and possibly also lower costs.
w Projects that will result in significantly longer lifetime for the field.
In all cases, it is a requirement that the project must undergo a defined decision process with milestones/”decision gates” and costs must be associated to the project.
The reserves reported should be considered profitable assuming long-term assumptions regarding product prices and operating costs. Projects where most of the investments are sunk costs should be reported as reserves as long as total cash flow, including contingent resources, are expected to be profitable.
At some time, continued operation for a field will become unprofitable. Dependent on other possibilities for continued operation of the field, the so-called uneconomic tail production should be reported as a contingent resource. If there is a reasonable probability for continued operation based on contingent or undiscovered resources, not restricted to current license acreage, this should preferably be reported in RC 5A. If more speculative, the resources could be reported in RC 7A.
RC 6 is used for deposits which, even in the long-term, probably cannot be recovered profitably and resources in minor, non-tested discoveries where recovery is not very likely. If the deposit is a supplementary resource to a field, it is reported under the field. Stand-alone discoveries are to be reported separately.
Improved recovery measures on fields (project category A) which have been evaluated and found to be unprofitable, shall not be reported in RC 6. If resources can be realized with other measures later on, they should be included in RC 7A.
Undiscovered recoverable resources in or nearby fields and discoveries will either comprise prospects or undrilled segments in the field/discovery, which for different reasons are not defined as a separate prospect.
The main rule is that undiscovered, recoverable risked volumes should be reported in RC 8. Risked volumes are calculated by multiplying expected recoverable petroleum quantities, given a discovery, by the probability of making a discovery. The total of risked volumes that lie completely or partly within own licensed area and which, given discovery, can be recovered in connection with the field/discovery, shall be reported. Prospects that extend over the borders of the production licence, or into adjoining production licences are to be reported as total risked volumes. In some cases where the discovery probability is high and the volumes are included in the base of a development solution, undiscovered resources may, in agreement with the NPD, be categorised differently.
Every autumn, on 15 October, all operators must report data and prognoses related to their fields, discoveries, transport and onshore facilities.
The reporting to the RNB is included in the basis for the state and national budget and the Government’s oil and environmental policy. It is therefore very important that the reporting is of high quality and that the deadlines are met, so that we can meet the deadlines set by the MPE.
Schedule for the RNB2019 reporting process
|15 October||First report from operators|
|29 October at 14:00||First feedback from NPD|
|5 November at 12:00||Second report from operators|
|9 November at 12:00||Second feedback from NPD|
|13 November at 12:00||Third report from operator|
If there are significant changes to the reporting as a result of budgetary processes in the production licenses’ management committees after 15 October, please contact the NPD as soon as possible to clarify whether there is a need to submit an updated reporting file.
The operators have been granted access to the following by 1 September:
This list will form the basis for the reporting. There is a separate process to handle this. Changes to the project list after 1 September must be clarified with the NPD.
The reporting file and guidelines are shown in column to the right.
The reporting must comply with the NPD’s resource classification.
The operators’ reporting to Gassco’s shipping plan/transport plan is included in the reporting file. These data should be submitted to Gassco, in accordance with a separate order from Gassco.
The data must be reported electronically in accordance with the format in the reporting file.
The reporting file must be handled and filled out correctly. No changes can be made to the layout of the spreadsheet and the name of the spreadsheet cannot be changed. No links to other spreadsheets can be added in the file that is delivered to the NPD.
The spreadsheet colours codes
Light yellow and grey cells shall not be completed
Light grey cells are optional to complete
White cells shall/can be completed
Paste using "paste special values"
The original formatting of cells cannot be overwritten. You must therefore only paste in values.
The operators are asked to follow the naming of the reporting files as indicated in column I in the project list. File names cannot contain dates or other extra information. Please name the files according to the examples shown below:
It is very important that the operator ensures the data is of high quality before they are sent to the NPD. If the NPD finds errors, deficiencies or anything that is unclear in the submitted reporting, the file will be returned with comments in the sheet “Tilbakemeldingsskjema” (Feedback form). The operator must then submit corrected reporting or responses to the comments.
Comment fields: Use the comment fields to explain significant changes in relation to the previous RNB reporting. What constitutes significant changes is explained in Chapter 6.1.3 of the guideline.
Consistency checks: If a consistency check is triggered, please correct the figures so that they correspond with each other, or explain why the figures are still reported.
If you have any questions regarding the reporting, please contact the following persons:
|General questions and questions regarding the reporting file||Tom Andersen||+47 51 87 62 75/
|Transfer of data, License to Share (L2S)||Magnar Haugvaldstad||+47 51 87 60 74/ RNB2019@npd.no|